To see the French president and prime minister was to see two men behind the polls under COSH, fighting for what they consider to be the essence of their political beliefs.
That sums up in this – how do Is S Kiel’s Starmer and Emmanuel Macron claim that they consider to be virtues of patience, nuance, subtlety and trade-offs?
The press conference hosted by the leader only had two lectures and two speakers, but two other actors hovered in the air.
Reforms of the UK and national assembly, the parties of Jordan Bardera and Marine Le Pen, were never explicitly mentioned. Not their leaders either. However, they were mentioned repeatedly implicitly.
The two political parties on either side of the channel are not the same, but they now have the ability to scare life from people in power.
They do so during periods of anti-realization enthusiasm, tricks to communication in plain languages, and disillusionment with the traditional political class. Quite a combination.
“We’ve worked so hard to get a return contract, but others are simply taking pictures of the matter,” the prime minister told us.
Who was he probably thinking?
“That’s where politics is. We have to show that practical politics is a way of bringing important consequences for both of us,” he adds, ensuring that he was not tempted by what he called “a simple answer politics.”
Reform leader Nigel Farage spent the morning in the English Channel boats of GB News camera company, viewing this new deal between Paris and London as a British humiliation.
He says the UK should abandon the European Human Rights Treaty and has a broader argument that the country can escape funk. Why not discuss the past few years?
Macron had a similar argument with the Prime Minister by returning from the national rally to his hometown to confront similar arguments.
The president argued that he should recognize the “complexity of the world” and avoid what he regarded as “temptation” of those he described as “populists.”
As I wrote here the other day, this is the latest evidence we are looking at the prime minister’s changing debate. This is Farage’s public critique and what I believe Sir Kiel will choose in the next election.
And the massive portion of the discussion between them two will be the intersection of small boats today and in the coming years.
A new poll for Portland Communications suggests that 26% of workers’ voters switched to reform in last year’s general elections, making it much more likely that they will return to work if the number of small boat intersections decreases.
The same vote suggests that ten years later, a year later, Labor said there was enough time to improve things throughout the work.
And almost half of all voters consider Nigel Farage the leader who represents the most change.
This is an insight into the challenge and a potential opportunity for the Prime Minister.
He wants to be patient in the opposite era, but claiming his opponent offers a false promise.
I hope government levers can deliver them in time. Let’s take a look.
One of the last thoughts.
This week I personally spoke with seniors, both the Labour and the Conservatives.
I don’t surprise both people I’ve spoken about that they don’t want British reforms to win the general election.
Both admitted that it was a real possibility, but both had deep concerns beyond that.
They both concluded that many voters concluded that the Conservatives failed last year, and that many voters either concluded the year or that labor was failing soon.
Reforms can be provided in ways that their predecessors did not manage.
But if Nigel Farage wins and he is deemed to have failed since then, what will it be like to have contemplated the two I spoke about?
Where do they wonder, and what political direction will the next country change?
