Diddy no celeb sex tapes, “two Angry Men” of minors in criminal cases… Pro or Con for Defense? ! ?
May 2, 2025 4:08 PM PDT
Play video content 2 Angry Men podcasts
Didi’s defense may be supported by the fact that there is a lot of noise about celebrity sex tapes and the minors involved in Didi criminal cases… these two things are not part of the case and can have a big impact on the ju judge.
On the “Two Angry Men” podcast, Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos explored one of their perceptions about the Diddy criminal case and how it wields the ju judge.
There is a false story that celebrity sex tapes and minors are part of the prosecution’s evidence against Diddy… with some people including potential ju-journers, and the case is a hip-hop version of Jeffrey Epstein.
I know neither of these sleazy topics will be talked about in court…and while Mark thinks that when it comes to choosing a ju umpire, it may harm Diddy’s defense, Harvey sees it as an opportunity for Diddy’s legal team.
A ju judge may go to trial thinking that the ju judge will hear about the dirt the prosecution has on Didi. It can also be a bit disappointing when no evidence of a secret record of a celebrity in which sex or minors are involved in any form, shape or shape is presented.
Mark needs a bit of persuasiveness here… but Harvey points out some good points.
The selection of ju judges begins on Monday, and the judges hope that within three days the ju judges will be selected… so this is all unfolding in the Manhattan courtroom.
TMZ has a lot of Diddy coverage as the trial begins… Check out the “Two Angry Men” podcasts wherever you listen to the podcast.
