As Malawi approaches the 2025 tripartite election, the ghosts of politically induced violence continue to cast a shadow over the democratic process. In this context, the recent meeting, convened by police inspector Merlyne Nachulu Yolamu, along with the youth oversight of 18 political parties, is a timely and admirable initiative. But the prolonged question is whether such involvement can realistically suppress political violence or do it serve as merely a symbolic gesture in a tension-filled political landscape?
The recognition of youth director Madame Yoram as an influential figure within each party highlights an important truth. Young people are often at the forefront of political mobilization, both as participants and assailants. With young people in Malawi form a large part of the population and many tackling unemployment and disillusionment, political parties often misuse energy and frustration to gain political mileage. The country has already seen unsettling incidents, including the undressing of women to wear opposition party regalia, which reflects a deeper culture of intolerance and political attacks.
While the Malawi Police are constitutionally mandated to be a neutral arbitrator of law and order, its track record during a period of political sensitivity has not always given them confidence. Allegations of bias, perceived as selective enforcement in favour of ruling parties, have eroded public trust for many years. Therefore, Ig Yolamu’s call for peace and dialogue must be supported by visible, consistent and fair actions. Without this, nonviolence appeals will fall into skeptical ears and will not be able to stop potential criminals who feel protected by political power.
Equally complicated is the role of the supervision of young political parties. In theory, these individuals wield influence within the parties. But in reality, they often operate under the strict control of senior party officials. If party leadership subtly supports or turns a blind eye to violence, youth oversight is unlikely to challenge the status quo. It is intentional for Yolamu to inspire young leaders to act as role models, but it assumes a level of autonomy and moral authority that many may not own. True leadership in this field must come from the top of each political party, with a solid directive, reinforced by actions that violence is not tolerated.
Dialogue is certainly a step in the right direction, but that’s not enough. Malawi has seen similar meetings and peace pledges in past election cycles, but has witnessed a flare of violence as tensions rose. What’s missing is the culture of accountability. Regardless of political affiliation, the cycle of immunity will continue unless the perpetrator of political violence receives prompt legal consequences. Civic education must also be amplified to instill the value of tolerance and democratic participation, especially among young people most susceptible to political manipulation.
Sign up for the AllAfrica newsletter for free
Get the latest African news
success!
Almost finished…
You need to check your email address.
Follow the instructions in the email you sent to complete the process.
error!
There was a problem processing the submission. Please try again later.
For Malawi to achieve a peaceful election, parties must go beyond rhetoric to commit to binding surveillance and enforced codes of conduct. Police must act decisively and fairly on their part. Youth involvement must also transcend politics and provide youth with real opportunities and alternatives to partisan mobilization.
In conclusion, although the inspector’s initiative to attract youth supervision is a positive gesture, it cannot suppress politically induced violence on its own. Enduring peace relies on broader commitment to justice, accountability and true political reform. Only then can Malawi navigate the path to election with unity, dignity and peace.
